Posted by: John Elliott | February 13, 2008

Demand from China kills India’s vanishing tigers

One of India’s greatest natural assets is wasting away. Or, to be more precise, it is being killed off because of political and bureaucratic corruption and inertia. That asset is the tiger, India’s national animal and the grandest of creatures living in the wild. Figures produced by the government yesterday estimate that there are only about 1,400 tigers left in India, down 60% from an official figure of 3,500 in 2002. If that rate of decimation continues, there will only be a couple hundred left in ten years time, so urgent action is needed.

Why am I writing about tigers on a Fortune magazine blog that focuses on business and, occasionally, politics? Mainly because their future is one of many ecological and environmental problems that are being ignored in a greedy rush for wealth and growth, and partly because it demonstrates how ineffective the Indian government can be when faced with vested interested at home and abroad. If the government cannot get to grips with this issue, then it seems unlikely to protect other parts of India’s heritage, and much of the country’s magic and culture will gradually vanish.

There is money to be made by poaching tigers and transporting them out of India, usually to China, where their bones and other body parts are used for traditional medicine, and their skins for trophies and (until recently) to adorn coats worn by officials and herdsmen on the Tibetan plateau. The Indian poacher makes relatively little (though their price is going up), but on the international market an animal can account for tens of thousands of dollars. Meanwhile politicians and bureaucrats grow rich on the kickbacks that are paid for them to facilitate, or at least ignore, the poachers and traders.

Conservationists have been warning for at least three years that India’s tiger population was down to 1,400-1,800, but this was not accepted by the government. But yesterday’s report, based on a new census, puts the figure at 1,411 (plus maybe another 80 in two states not included). It admits that the margin of error means the real total could be anywhere between 1,165 and 1,657. The government is trying to reduce the shock of the 60% loss by saying its 2002 figure was over-estimated. It is also trying to soften the blow by claiming that tigers living in protected areas are doing well and only those elsewhere are being killed, which conservationists say is wrong.

The government has, however, made some important statements. For the first time the report accepts that tigers are being lost because of encroachment into forest areas for wood-cutting, animal grazing and even mining, which means both loss of habitat and prey. It recognizes that “it is essential to set aside inviolate areas devoid of human presence” for tigers and other wild animals and adds: “Tigers are a conservation dependent species requiring large contiguous forests with fair interspersion of undisturbed breeding areas.”

The report also accepts the wider picture, explaining why the tiger is more than just a tourist attraction. “[The] tiger is not only a flag bearer of conservation but also an umbrella species for majority of eco-regions in the Indian subcontinent. Its role as a top predator is vital in regulating and perpetuating ecological processes and systems.” Put more simply, if India makes a real effort to save the tiger, it will at the same time be saving areas where other animals can live and where rivers can flow naturally. If such areas are deforested , they are lost to nature – forests are cut down, animals vanish, rivers are diverted, and the ecological balance is upset with consequential siltation and floods.

Sadly few people see that link, and the tiger does not grab the sort of widespread public admiration in India that it has abroad, even though it has a place in the Hindu religion with the goddess Durga being worshipped riding a tigress. So it is easy for the government to issue reports and then do little. What it should be doing is revamping its grossly under-staffed and unmotivated forest guard service, and strengthening enforcement and prosecution of poachers and traders.

But the problem will never be solved by tackling the supply side. This is a demand-driven trade and the only really effective way to protect tigers is to persuade China fully to implement – and continue – a ban on the use of their skins and body parts. “If India wants wild tigers, it not only has to improve enforcement but stem the demand by talking forcefully to China,” says Belinda Wright, one of India’s leading tiger conservationists.

India however seems scared of tackling China on this issue, probably because it has sensitive border differences with its large neighbor that defeated it in a war in 1962.


Responses

  1. One should remember that conserving tiger is more about conserving the diversity and viability of the country in the long run than about conserving a poor animal whatsoever strong and ferocious it may be. If in Indian mythology goddess Durga is portrayed riding tiger, it is symbolic of deriving power from conservation on the magnificent animal. It is difficult but not impossible to estimate the economic benefits of conserving tiger (or the economic loss of not doing so) in a systematic way. Conservation of tiger is an inclusive project that should take into consideration conservation of forests, biodiversity, water bodies management, accessibility and transport, tribal welfare and education, professionalism of forest staff, awareness campaign for general public, establishment of fast track courts to deal with the menace of poaching and encroachment, planned development of cities and villages to reduce pressure on forest land, increasing per acre yield of farm products, systematizing the wildlife tourism, providing better job opportunities for the affected people due to conservation effort, the list goes on. It is futile trying to save “tiger” as an animal. The purpose of tiger conservation is much bigger and consequences of not doing so even more horrifying.

  2. Since when is a cowardly nation ever a superpower? Until India gets a strong govt that builds up its military and crushes China in warfare, all this talk of ‘Indian greatness’ is nonsense.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    You are correct. Real superpowers become superpowers by using power and force to make themselves more powerful. Other countries do not attack the U.S. because the U.S. is superior in the art of warfare. A few terrorists have attcked the U.S., but these people are not a government. The only reason they fight is because they really have nothing to lose.

    India is a passive nation that is trying to get by. But this will never create a threat to other nations. China would easily crush India again in warfare. India’s best bet is to start executing any Indians that hunt and sell tigers.

  3. What this proves ..esp the last statement … is that all this talk of Indian ‘superpower’ is nonsense. India is a cowardly nation that was trounced vs China, and the Indians cower with fear re China. Since when is a cowardly nation ever a superpower? Until India gets a strong govt that builds up its military and crushes China in warfare, all this talk of ‘Indian greatness’ is nonsense.

  4. its horrible…it make my blood boil…but this congress govt….is the most corrupt I have ever seen ..coming after five years and in the mid of economic growth..just look at each MLA, MP of Congress…they have become millionaires in themselves…they don’t even have any BRAINS to understand the damage they are doing to our society…???!!!!!

  5. http://www.salon.com/health/feature/1999/09/22/medicinal_animals/print.html

    A link thats related

  6. Mate its not the seller’s problem .. the link closes in at the root .. the Superstitious who are rich .. when You are a Moron and u have the Money to Indulge in even more crazyness .. then it becomes hard to stop that crazyness unless the one who wants to stop it is better off then you or has a little more of the intellect .. both are negative here .. hence the crazyness prevails

    Rgds
    Sperme
    http://forwardcontract.blogspot.com

  7. it is obviously the seller’s problem. They should not sell tigers for money. Forget about the demands.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: