Posted by: John Elliott | October 3, 2011

Dynastic secrecy protected by India’s tame media

 The omertà on Sonia Gandhi’s illness

At last, there is some high profile questioning about why the health of Sonia Gandhi, leader of India’s governing coalition, the United Progressive Alliance (UPA), has been kept officially secret since the beginning of August when she was reported to have gone to New York for an operation believed to be for cancer.

The question was publicly raised over the weekend in a cover story How ill is Mrs Gandhi? published by India Today, a weekly news magazine, which provides no new answers but in effect challenges the Gandhi family’s insistence on secrecy.

Coincidentally, Gandhi yesterday made her first public appearance (below) since returning from the US on September 8, when she attended events in Delhi that marked the birth anniversary of Mahatma Gandhi, India’s independence leader.

No one is questioning why Sonia Gandhi did not appear in public earlier after what is reported to have been an operation for first-degree cancer, but there is serious questioning abut whether – and why – India’s top politician should keep such an important illness and hospitalisation a secret. Alongside that, and maybe more significantly, why has the Indian media been loath to challenge that secrecy?

Gandhi’s singular political importance is beyond doubt. If there was any doubt earlier, it was confirmed while she was away by the UPA government’s erratic behaviour on the Anna Hazare anti-corruption movement and on-going telecoms scandal. On both issues, prime minister Manmohan Singh failed to exert the authority that should go with his job, while Rahul Gandhi, Sonia’s son and long seen as a future prime minister, failed to rise publicly to the challenge as heir apparent.

Other key politicians such as home minister Palaniappan Chidambaram and telecom minister Kapil Sibal mishandled their briefs (and seriously damaged their reputations), while the four leading Congress Party figures Gandhi named as being in charge (including son Rahul) made no public impression. She was clearly missed.

She has now been back for just over three weeks, and some sense of normalcy appears to have returned to the running of the coalition.

However, that begs a question. Did the disarray while she was away develop because the government was missing her sure touch and gift of sensing what needed to be done politically, or because ministers and officials were scared to make decisions that might arouse her (or Rahul’s) wrath later?

Or, as a political observer put it to me on Saturday, was it because the Gandhi dynasty has taken over normal  governmental channels of authority and decision making to such an extent that the cabinet and administration cannot work without its leader at the head.

Whatever the answer – and maybe it was a mixture of all three – Gandhi has managed over the past 13 years that she has been engaged in active politics to build such an exclusive and untouchable aura of privacy and secrecy, combined with ultimate authority, that few people dare publicly to question her role or criticise the supremacy of the dynasty that she heads. It could be argued that this displays a high level of dynastic insecurity and fear of being unseated, which in turn would explain why the illness was – and still is – officially a secret.

Gandhi is of course an elected parliamentarian, so it would be wrong as well as unfair to compare her with a dictator. The acceptance however of her pre-eminent position, and that of the dynasty, would be envied by many less democratically based rulers, as would her ability to rule with a minimum of public utterances – she appears in public relatively rarely, and never makes herself available for the sort of public questioning faced by national leaders elsewhere.

Even Cuba’s ruler, Fidel Castro’s illnesses were publicly discussed in 2006. Politicians in the US are accustomed to public exposure, while Manmohan Singh’s heart bypass operation in 2009 was announced. Earlier however the illnesses of Atal Bihari Vajpayee, the previous prime minister, were (and still are) largely kept private.

So even if one recognises that politicians like Gandhi will maintain as much privacy as they can muster, this still leaves the question of the Indian’s media’s largely hands-off response.

It is true that the media here rarely reports on the private liaisons and even offspring of top politicians, but that is surely different from failing to explore the country’s top political leader going abroad for a life-threatening operation – Gandhi’s visit to the US for treatment was first reported by the international news media, and was then only lightly covered in India.

There was a good debate on some of the issues on India’s CNN-IBN tv channel on August 12, and a more recent article  The omertà on Sonia Gandhi’s illness in The Hindu newspaper that mischievously, given Gandhi’s Italian origins, picked the Italian code of silence word omertà for its headline . The Business Standard newspaper also ran an editorial on Right to Information – Mrs Sonia Gandhi’s health is a matter of public concern on August 7.

Such scattered programmes and articles however scarcely amount to a real attempt to discover – either through an official spokesman or other sources – the nature and seriousness of the illness. Such disregard by the media of its proper role in guarding the public interest is surely not healthy for a democracy – nor on the other hand is the secrecy and aura that seems to have triggered that reaction.


  1. […] that, Sonia Gandhi has had long-term health problems, though it is not known how serious they are (or were) and she has recently seemed to be fully back at work, and Rahul has lost his credibility with […]

  2. I disagree! The one thing I like about Indian media is the fact that it generally keeps away from the private lives of politicians. This is useful as it does not mix issues of individual’s morality and choices with his/her politics. This makes social reforms easier to implement in a quiet, seamless manner as it usually happens in India. Also, even if she had announced her illness what difference would that had made, except for causing great problems for the hospital staff by congress sycophants wanting to wish Madam ji well.

  3. The media in India are worse than ‘tame’ – they misinform gullible public to protect interests of party in power, politicians, bureaucrats, large corporates, media cronies, moneybags. With the fourth estate like this, Indian democracy is depending solely on the judiciary to safeguard the masses, albeit to a very limited extent. The arrogance shown by Congress leaders (other than Sonia, Rahul and the PM) indicates their dictatorial approach in governance. A serious danger for the Indian society. People’s tolerance may boil over and with media having lost its credibility will not be in a position to guard against public angst turning violent, as has been witnessed world over.

  4. I am really glad that you have flagged the tameness of the media here in India.Day after day we have to suffer a media which is totally in cahoots with the Congress party.The question is not about Mrs Gandhi’s illness; it is about a media which often descends into being an apologist for the ruling party under the guise of “liberal-ness”. This same media has glossed over the fact that Mr Ottavio Quattrochi of the Bofors scam is closely aligned with the Dynasty.
    Add to that a compromised and patronage seeking academic establishment and a business world eager to compromise with anyone who is in power, there is no freedom of opinion in India, other than over the social media networks-which explains why some Congress politicians are filing affidavits against these!

  5. This attitude of Media is a reflection of general attitude of the very Indian psyche of worshipping the Charismatic Character. The Congress people know it and are exploiting it to the hilt. The Charisma of Gandhi was hijacked by Nehru to his only daughter and handed down to every one from the family be it Priyanka Vadhra. She will suffix it with Gandhi.
    It has been seen that Indians are too forgiving for Charismatic person. All the Gurus and Acharyas are given the place of God by us. The Sai Bba truth will not dawn upon us till he dies. And Gandhis are not allowed to die by Congress people. They know they can continue looting us under the shadow of a Charismatic leader. The Congress had none other than this Nehru family. For a short period they got P V Narsimha Rao and that time Sonia Gandhi was marginalized. She was in a Shell during that period. She did not display any leadership quality that time. After his rule was brought to end by the only one Charismatic leader in opposition Mr Atal Behari Vajpayee, the Congress started grooming her to take over the role of Gandhi. She was trained to speak. I remember once when she brought a no confidence motion against the NDA Mr Atal Bihari dismissed it with contempt of three sentences and he replied to none of her points. Mr Atal once went ahead much further. There was a subject where Mr Atal Bihari had said that his Govt had open mind on the subject. But when he saw strange arguments flowing from her side he just told,’ Khula dimag hone ka matlab khali dimag hona nahin hota’. The entire Congress eas burning with anger because it was an indirect hint of her being empty headed. But Congress will cultivate Rahul as a Charismatic person and keep her till she is replaced by him.

  6. It s indeed a disgrace that the Indian media across the board has kept itself aloof, with some exceptions, from the nature and seriousness of the illness of the top politician of the country. Congrats John for raising the issue in such a thoughtful and elegant manner. It is not as if necessary medical expertise was lacking in India to tackle Sonia’s illness.In fact, sections of the thinking middle class have indeed felt ashamed that the matter was kept completely out of public scrutiny and analysis by the ruling dynasty, the ruling political formation and the main opposition party in parliament. This speaks very poorly of the quality of Indian democracy.

  7. Even by the normal high standards of ‘ Riding the Elephant ‘ blogs , this is an exceptional article . It makes one wonder about the nature and future course of Indian democracy itself , more than 60 years after independence . Saif

  8. BRAVO !! The smug and overconfident media needed to be pulled up.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: