Posted by: John Elliott | July 10, 2017

China India standoff raises memories of 1962 war

China wants to build a road at a strategic point in the Himalayas

For the past three weeks it has sometimes seemed, from India media reports and aggressive statements coming out of Beijing, that there has been a distinct possibility of a Himalayan border war breaking out between the two countries high, 55 years after India suffered a humiliating military defeat in the area at the hands of its larger Asian neighbour in 1962.

Modi-Xi HamburgIt is unlikely to happen because neither side wants a war, but the long confrontation has been closer in physical terms and noisier in the media than in the past – at least until China’s president Xi Jinping and India’s prime minister Narendra Modi met, smiled, and chatted (left) while attending a regional meeting at the G20 assembly in Hamburg last Friday (July 7).

That is not to underplay the importance of what has been happening on the 2,500 mile long undemarcated border in a face-off over Chinese road construction that has also for the first time drawn the tiny kingdom of Bhutan into the two nuclear powers’ border disputes.

The Chinese media has played a major role in raising the tempo and yesterday The Global Times, an outspoken government-linked newspaper even went to the extent of suggesting that India’s role in the border issue with Bhutan would justify another country interfering in its northern region of Kashmir.

China, led by the increasingly powerful and assertive Xi, is in a belligerent mood and is trying to extend its reach and power in areas such as the South and East China Seas as well as in the Himalayas, while also underlining its sovereignty of Hong Kong that it regained from British rule 20 years ago on June 30 1997.

Speaking on the day of the anniversary, a Beijing foreign ministry spokesman said that the UK that had no role in the future of its former territory, even though the 1984 Sino-British Joint Declaration that led to the 1997 handover gave it a monitoring role for 50 years. The spokesman said that, as “a historical document”, the joint declaration “no longer has any practical significance”. It was not at all binding for Beijing’s management over Hong Kong.

1962 “historical lessons”

Similarly slapping down India, a China’s People Liberation Army spokesman on June 29 implicitly alluded to the 1962 defeat when he said that India should learn from “historical lessons”. He was responding to India’s army chief saying his troops were ready for a “two-and-a-half-front war”, referring to China, Pakistan and internal security.

Britain has regularly failed effectively to monitor developments in Hong Kong, and there are doubts about India’s war-readiness, but it was a sign of China’s increased assertiveness that, in the space of two days, the UK should be publicly told it had no role and that India should be reminded so openly about its 1962 defeat.

India has however resisted latest China’s territorial ambitions, despite the aggressive noises from Beijing. Perhaps Modi has heard that Barack Obama, America’s former president, once said of China: “You have to be pretty firm with them, because they will push as hard as they can until they meet resistance”.

Nathu La Pass, in Sikkim, AP file photo

The border at the Nathu La Pass in Sikkim – AP file photo

In the Himalayas, China’s army has been steadily moving into Bhutan territory with tracks and roads for several years, but has met with virtually no resistance. The current crisis has arisen because its road construction has entered the specially sensitive Doklam plateau (below) that Bhutan claims as its territory but which China also claims as part of Donglang region.

The location on the China-Bhutan-India trijunction is separate from the main areas disputed by India and China, but is it critically important because the Doklam plateau overlooks China’s Chumbi Valley, a strategically important ‘v’ shaped area of Tibet located between the Indian state of Sikkim to the west and Bhutan to the east. The 9,500 ft high valley juts down towards a strip of Indian territory called the Siliguri Corridor (dubbed the “chicken’s neck”), which is the only land route from the main land mass of India to its north-eastern states.

chumbi mapThe closer China gets to the Siliguri Corridor down the Chumbi Valley, the  better equipped it would be in a war to try to cut India off from the north eastern states and invade Arunachal Pradesh, which it claims, while also making land grabs on other states and on Bhutan.

Building the road would give it a distinct strategic advantage, as Shivshankar Menon, India’s former national security adviser, has told .

Because of the sensitivity, Bhutan objected and India confronted the Chinese troops and blocked construction work. That brought the opposing army troops face to face and provoked a complaint from local Chinese army commanders early in June that India had invaded its territory.

China chose to publicise the clash and complain to Delhi just as Modi was about to meet President Donald Trump for the first time in Washington on June 26. This led observers to suggest that China had timed the move as a warning to India of what could happen if it continued to grow closer to the US. China is unhappy with a more aggressive stance adopted by Modi in recent months, which has included a boycott of its trans-national One Belt One Road infrastructure and trade initiative.

Bhutan’s objections were unusual because the country, sandwiched between China and India, generally stays quiet. But on June 29 its ambassador in New Delhi delivered a formal demarche to China at its embassy – they are located five minutes drive from each other in Delhi’s Chanakyapuri diplomatic area.

“Recently, the Chinese army started construction of a road towards Bhutanese Army camp at Zomphlri in Doklam area which is in violation of an agreement between the two countries”, Vetsop Namgyel, Bhutan’s ambassador, told India’s main news agency.

“Peace and tranquility”

He was referring to a written agreement with China that that there should be “peace and tranquility” till their disputed border was agreed. That is complicated because it involves reconciling disputes about the relevance of historic documents and agreements going back more than a century to a time when Bhutan had not even decided where it thought its borders lay. An 1890 agreement with Britain gave China sovereignty over Donglang, which was subsequently claimed by Bhutan.

India used to run Bhutan’s foreign affairs, but is now only consulted. The relationship is close however, as was shown by India’s response. Bhutan does not have diplomatic relations with China and has been resisting demands from Beijing to open them, though it does have regular but inconclusive meetings on the 470km border.

From conversations I had on my last visit to Bhutan two years ago, it was clear that there is considerable resentment about India’s sometimes overbearing interference in Bhutan’s affairs, along with a growing demand for formal relations with Beijing, which would weaken India’s role.

Hamburg atmosphere

There was excited media coverage about how Xi and Modi would not meet while they were in Hamburg, and that this would show that relations between the two countries were at a new and dangerously low point.

In fact, neither side was ready for formal talks because no solution was in sight and a formal meeting would have been useless or maybe even counter-productive. As a Chinese spokesman put it, the “atmosphere” was “not right”.

The informal meeting between Xi and Modi does however appear to have gone well with the two leaders apparently praising each others economic and anti-terrorist successes, while avoiding, at least as far as diplomatic briefings have revealed, anything about the standoff in the mountains.

Lobsang-Sangay-CTAThat has softened the mood, at least in the capitals. It is too early to predict how the situation will be solved, though it could be done with all sides agreeing to withdraw pending talks between China and Bhutan. Meanwhile, on the same day that Xi and Modi met, China issued a safety advisory to its citizens living in India to pay close attention to the security, which may have been part of the loud diplomatic onslaught before the leaders met.

Coincidentally, India, Japan and the US begin annual naval exercises in the Indian Ocean today (July 10), bringing together three countries concerned about China’s expansionary ambitions.

India’s relations with China now look like becoming even more fractious because the head of the India-based Tibetan government-in-exile, Lobsang Sangay, on July 5 unfurled the Tibetan national flag on the shores of Pang Gong lake in Ladakh (above). The lake spans the border between India and China’s Tibetan region at a height of over 14,000ft. This is the first time the independent Tibet flag has been unfurled there it is certain to anger China, which tolerates India hosting the government in exile along with the Dalai Lama, providing neither engages in political or diplomatic activity.

Relations between China and India have always been complicated, both before and after the 1962 war, but China’s growing territorial and international ambitions add new dimensions that are likely to lead to more crises.

No shot has been fired on the border for 40 years, though there are frequent confrontations. That is in striking contrast to the regular firing on India’s Pakistan line of control, but it underlines how serious would be if shooting begins.


  1. […] Modi, India’s prime minister, stood firm and eventually after more than two months there was an understanding that enabled both sides to claim an advantage, though nothing was settled and China established a […]

  2. […] Modi, India’s prime minister, stood firm and eventually after more than two months there was an understanding that enabled both sides to claim an advantage, though nothing was settled and China established a […]

  3. […] Modi, India’s prime minister, stood agency and finally after greater than two months there was an understanding that enabled either side to assert a bonus, although nothing was settled and China established a […]

  4. […] Modi, India’s prime minister, stood firm and eventually after more than two months there was an understanding that enabled both sides to claim an advantage, though nothing was settled and China established a […]

  5. […] has sounded tough against China since last summer when the two countries’ armies had a 10-week confrontation at Doklam, a remote plateau in Bhutan on their undefined border known as the Line of Actual Control. The […]

  6. […] has sounded tough against China since last summer when the two countries’ armies had a 10-week confrontation at Doklam, a remote plateau in Bhutan on their undefined border known as the Line of Actual Control. The […]

  7. great article with insights

  8. The more a nation is peace loving, the more it suffers. Even that country will have no friends. No body wants to stand with a loser. India is perfect example of this despite the fact that we have never invaded any country ever.

  9. Your article contain too many factual errors to be rebuked one by one. May be your only source is from Indian media. Why don’t you hear from what actual Bhutanese has to say on this matter?

    And here is a good article from someone who actually knows what he is talking about:

  10. In 1962 I was in India in Calcutta having left school and about to enter tertiary education. The Chines invaded India and my late father and late uncle both of whom had served India, the former in the Jat Regiment of the Indian Army and the latter as IG of Calcutta Policeor Bengal Police were immediately embroiled in preparations in case the Chinese attacked Calcutta.
    I was a mere teenager but my uncle tasked me with helping, well actually doing the organisation of the evacuation of tea garden personnel for his firm Williamson Magor from Assam. Calcutta only really had one decent hotel The Grand and for all these people they had to be accommodated in private homes; my own parents took in a couple with two sets of twins who had to leave with one suitcase. Then their onward journeys had to be arranged – the logistics were quite complicated with uncertainty. The RAF came to help but found the Kohima and other air strips too small for their planes. The IAF was superb and did a wonderful job.
    John Tidmarsh of the BBC covered the news in Calcutta and Charles Wheeler in Delhi. Because John became friendly with me and my family he came to know things and admitted that Charles was saying that he received hardly any information in Delhi whereas we knew more.
    The Indian Army had been badly let down by Nehru and the awful Krishna Menon who was afraid of the army and feared a military coup such as had taken place in Pakistan. Thus the Indian Army was badly provisioned and with poor equipment and clothing and transport. It was a humiliating defeat for fine men. General Bogi Sen did his best in the circumstances.
    I saw the young men with frost bite; it was shameful as they had no warm clothing or boots. The whole episode was a shocking humiliation for India and the foolish Indian civilians were ostentatiously cancelling their Diwali parties and not appreciating the real potential.
    Meanwhile, the US under President Kennedy was fronting up to Krushchev and the Cuban Missile Crisis at exactly the same time.
    After that PM Nehru lost all his credibility and reputation BUT Mr Modi needs to learn the lesson; Nehru had turned a blind eye to the invasion of Tibet and said nothing yet he agreed to the young Dalai Lama gaining refuge. He and Menon almost made fun of the Hungarian Uprising in 1957 and subsequent put down by Russia. They were good at turning blind eyes, but boy did they squeal when the Chinese walked into India and stopped 30 miles east of Tejpur.
    Mr Modi may think sweet words at G20 will swing it. Don’t you believe it. My studies included the origins and ethics of Imperialism and my tutor a Sinologist warned that the Chinese would be the last great imperialists globally. We are witnessing that prediction now.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: